Free: Contests & Raffles.
rasbo, I tried to vote for all options that involved taking wolves but it wouldn't let me... :chuck:The more involved I get in this wolf debate, the more painfully obvious it becomes that we need to oppose wolves all together, just in hopes of getting any reasonable management. It is going to take a lot of opposition to get any reasonable answer and then it's still doubtful. The Defenders of Wildlife have infiltrated our WDFW and the legal establishment, so the odds are stacked against any reasonable management.It is absolutely imperative that people be very vocal on this wolf issue. We are at the same crossroads as Idaho was in the late 90's. In 5 to 10 years some areas in Washington will be a repeat of Idaho's Lolo zone. (90% loss of elk from pre-wolf population levels) Thanks rasbo for your post keeping this issue in people's minds.
I voted sound MGT... However that means eradication of the Gray wolf... You could convince me that the indigenous timber wolf of the region Could/Should make a come back and deserves protection... That would be a honest debate.... The gray wolf is and invasive non native species like the Ferrel hogs in the south... They should be left no quarter just like the hogs... Gun em all down. I'm with BP i think we need to tow a hard line to get what is reasonable..
Rasbo true sound management would include hunting this would be my choice.